
Challenges for Indonesian Water Utilities in Reducing NRW
Strategic Solutions for Non-Revenue Water Reduction and Operational Excellence for Indonesian Water Utilities Company (PDAM)
Reading Time: 21 minutes
Key Highlights
Critical Infrastructure Gap: Indonesia's water utility sector comprises approximately 380-391 PDAMs serving only about 20% of households with piped water connections, while approximately 46% of domestic water comes from groundwater sources, creating significant challenges for sustainable water resource management.
Non-Revenue Water Challenge: Average NRW levels range from 30-35% nationally, with Infrastructure Asia estimating annual economic losses of approximately USD 579 million, significantly impacting the financial sustainability of water utilities across the archipelago.
Operational Performance Issues: BPPSPAM performance assessments reveal considerable variation in PDAM health status, with approximately 40-50% of utilities classified as less healthy or unhealthy, indicating fundamental operational and management capacity gaps.
Technology Implementation Success: Proven case studies demonstrate achievable results, with Malang City reducing NRW by 30% over a 10-year period, while USAID-SECO partnership programs invested USD 4.5 million across seven PDAMs in Java for NRW reduction between 2019-2022.
International Partnership Models: Collaborations with Dutch VEI, Korean KOICA, Swiss SECO, and other development partners have established proven frameworks for sustainable NRW reduction, with WI.Plat signing four MOUs at World Water Forum 2024.
Executive Summary
Indonesia's water utility sector faces unprecedented operational challenges with 380-391 regional PDAMs struggling to provide adequate service coverage while managing critical infrastructure deficiencies. With only 20% of Indonesian households accessing piped water and NRW levels averaging 30-35%, the sector requires comprehensive transformation through technology adoption, capacity building, and institutional strengthening to achieve the government's 2030 target of universal piped water access.1
Non-Revenue Water averaging 30-35% nationally represents approximately USD 579 million in annual economic losses according to Infrastructure Asia assessments, while BPPSPAM performance evaluations demonstrate systemic operational challenges requiring comprehensive intervention strategies.1 Research analyzing PDAM financial performance during 2019-2022 indicates that the majority of PDAMs experienced losses and face operational sustainability challenges, highlighting the urgent need for systematic operational improvements.2
Successful international partnerships demonstrate achievable improvement pathways, with proven case studies including Malang City's 30% NRW reduction achievement and ongoing USAID-SECO programs generating measurable operational enhancements across seven strategic utility implementations.3 These success stories provide replicable frameworks for utilities seeking to improve operational performance and financial sustainability through strategic technology deployment and capacity development.
Understanding Indonesia's PDAM Non-Revenue Water Crisis
Indonesia's regional water utilities face critical operational challenges stemming from decades of underinvestment, fragmented management structures, and inadequate technical capacity development. The nation's 380-391 PDAMs operate within highly decentralized frameworks where local government ownership creates competing priorities between public service obligations and revenue generation requirements. This institutional structure frequently results in political interference, inadequate capital investment, and limited operational autonomy that collectively undermine service delivery effectiveness.
Most utilities remain remarkably small with fewer than 10,000 connections, while only approximately 4% serve more than 50,000 customers, creating economies of scale challenges that compound operational inefficiencies. This fragmentation prevents utilities from justifying investments in advanced technology systems, specialized technical staff, or comprehensive training programs essential for modern water loss management. Small utilities often lack technical capacity to implement systematic NRW reduction programs, relying instead on reactive maintenance approaches that fail to address underlying infrastructure deterioration.
Non-Revenue Water levels demonstrate significant variation across Indonesia's diverse utility landscape. According to Infrastructure Asia's 2022 report, average NRW stands at approximately 33%, with best-performing utilities achieving around 20% NRW while underperforming utilities experience losses exceeding 40%.1 These losses occur through multiple pathways including physical infrastructure deterioration, illegal connections, meter inaccuracies, and billing system inadequacies that collectively undermine utility financial sustainability.
The piped water coverage challenge is particularly acute, with only about 20% of Indonesian households having access to piped water, and only half of those using it as their main drinking water source. Meanwhile, approximately 37% of households rely on self-supply sources, primarily groundwater, which poses sustainability and quality concerns. This limited coverage perpetuates inequality in water access, with low-income communities disproportionately affected by inadequate piped water availability forcing reliance on expensive alternative sources or unsafe water supplies.
Non-Revenue Water Components and Loss Pathways:
Physical Losses (Real Losses):
• Pipeline leakage from aging infrastructure and inadequate maintenance practices
• Service connection leaks at customer meters and household plumbing
• Storage tank overflows from improper level control and operational errors
• Transmission main breaks during pressure surges and system transients
• Distribution network leaks at joints, valves, and pipe fittings
• Leakage on utility-owned infrastructure before customer meter point
Commercial Losses (Apparent Losses):
• Meter inaccuracies from aging equipment and improper sizing selections
• Illegal connections bypassing metering systems and billing procedures
• Billing errors from manual reading mistakes and data entry problems
• Unauthorized consumption through tampered meters and stolen water
• Data handling errors in billing systems and customer databases
• Unbilled authorized consumption for fire fighting and system maintenance
Root Causes Analysis: Technical, Financial, and Institutional Challenges
PDAM operational challenges stem from interconnected technical, financial, and institutional factors that create self-reinforcing cycles of underperformance and service degradation. Understanding these root causes enables targeted intervention strategies addressing fundamental operational barriers rather than merely treating symptoms of systemic dysfunction.
Technical challenges include aging distribution networks constructed during rapid development periods without adequate maintenance protocols, inadequate metering infrastructure that prevents accurate water loss quantification, and insufficient staff technical capacity for advanced leak detection and network optimization.4 Many utilities lack comprehensive Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping, hydraulic modeling capabilities, and real-time monitoring technologies essential for modern water loss management programs.
Pipeline infrastructure frequently dates from the 1970s and 1980s, exceeding design life expectations and experiencing increasing failure rates. Materials including asbestos cement and unlined cast iron demonstrate particular vulnerability to corrosion and structural failure. Network expansion during development booms often prioritized rapid construction over quality installation, creating legacy infrastructure challenges requiring substantial capital investment for rehabilitation or replacement.
Financial constraints represent critical operational barriers. Research analyzing PDAM financial performance during 2019-2022 indicates that the majority of PDAMs experienced losses and face operational sustainability challenges.2 Local governments have historically set tariffs below cost recovery levels to maintain political popularity, creating chronic undercapitalization that prevents necessary network rehabilitation and technology acquisition. Energy costs comprise a significant operational expense component, with some utilities spending 30-40% of budgets on electricity for pumping and treatment.
Financial Performance Constraints:
Revenue Challenges:
• Tariff levels set below full cost recovery requirements by local governments
• Collection efficiency problems from inadequate billing systems and enforcement
• Limited customer base due to low service coverage and connection rates
• High NRW levels reducing billable water volumes and revenue generation
• Delayed payment from government institutions and large industrial customers
• Inadequate tariff adjustment mechanisms failing to track inflation and cost increases
Cost Pressures:
• Energy expenses consuming 30-40% of operational budgets at inefficient utilities
• Chemical treatment costs rising with deteriorating raw water quality
• Maintenance expenditures increasing as infrastructure ages and fails more frequently
• Staff costs without corresponding productivity improvements and efficiency gains
• Debt service obligations from past infrastructure investments and expansion projects
• Regulatory compliance costs for water quality testing and environmental monitoring
Institutional challenges include local government interference in utility operations, inadequate performance management systems, and limited accountability mechanisms. Since regional autonomy implementation in 1999, PDAMs increasingly serve local government funding needs rather than focusing on service excellence. The dual mandate requiring utilities to provide public services while generating local government revenue creates fundamental management conflicts compromising operational effectiveness and long-term planning.
Frequent management changes following local elections disrupt long-term strategic planning and limit institutional knowledge retention. New directors often lack technical backgrounds in water utility management, prioritizing political considerations over operational requirements. This management instability prevents sustained focus on NRW reduction programs requiring multi-year implementation commitments and consistent resource allocation to achieve meaningful results.
BPPSPAM Performance Assessment Framework and Utility Classification
The Badan Pendukung Pengembangan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum (BPPSPAM) conducts annual performance assessments of PDAMs using 18 indicators across four aspects, providing comprehensive evaluation framework for utility operational effectiveness and financial sustainability. This assessment system enables comparative performance analysis, identifies improvement priorities, and supports targeted technical assistance programs for underperforming utilities.
BPPSPAM Performance Assessment Components:
Financial Aspect (25% weight):
• Liquidity ratio measuring short-term financial obligations coverage capacity
• Solvency ratio assessing long-term debt service capability and financial stability
• Profitability indicators including operating ratio and return on assets
• Billing effectiveness measuring revenue collection efficiency and receivables management
• Cost recovery performance evaluating tariff adequacy for operational sustainability
• Investment capacity demonstrating ability to fund infrastructure improvements
Service Aspect (25% weight):
• Service coverage percentage of population with piped water access
• Customer growth rates indicating expansion and connection development
• Complaint handling effectiveness and customer satisfaction metrics
• Water quality compliance with Indonesian drinking water standards
• Service continuity measuring hours of water availability daily
• Response time for service requests and emergency repairs
Operational Aspect (35% weight):
• Non-Revenue Water levels as percentage of total system input volume
• Production efficiency maximizing output from treatment plant capacity
• Operating hours ensuring adequate water availability to customers
• Technical water quality meeting treatment standards throughout distribution
• Energy efficiency minimizing power consumption per unit water delivered
• Maintenance effectiveness preventing infrastructure failures and service interruptions
Human Resources Aspect (15% weight):
• Staff-to-customer ratio measuring labor productivity and efficiency
• Training hours per employee annually for capacity development
• Technical competency levels of operations and maintenance personnel
• Staff retention rates indicating organizational stability
• Performance management systems for accountability and development
• Succession planning ensuring continuity of technical expertise
Performance categories classify utilities as Healthy (score greater than 2.8), Less Healthy (score 2.2-2.8), and Sick (score less than 2.2). The 2017 assessment of 378 PDAMs showed 209 utilities (55.3%) classified as healthy, 103 (27.2%) as less healthy, and 66 (17.5%) as sick. More recent assessments indicate ongoing challenges, with approximately 40-50% of PDAMs requiring significant operational improvements to achieve sustainable service delivery and financial performance.
Economic and Operational Impact Assessment
Indonesia's PDAM operational challenges generate substantial economic losses while limiting infrastructure development capacity. The financial impact extends beyond direct utility revenue losses to encompass broader economic costs including foregone tax revenues, reduced industrial productivity, and household expenses for alternative water sources. Quantifying these impacts demonstrates the economic imperative for systematic NRW reduction and operational improvement programs.
According to Infrastructure Asia's 2022 report, annual economic losses from NRW total approximately USD 579 million, resulting from water production, treatment, and distribution investments that generate no revenue return through system losses.1 This substantial loss undermines utility financial sustainability, prevents necessary infrastructure investment, and limits service expansion to unserved populations requiring piped water access.
Labor productivity metrics reveal operational inefficiencies, with best-performing utilities achieving approximately 4 staff per 1,000 connections while underperforming utilities exceed 9 staff per 1,000 connections. This productivity gap demonstrates operational management challenges including inadequate work planning, insufficient staff training, and limited use of modern technology systems for field operations and customer service delivery. Improving labor productivity through better systems and processes offers immediate cost savings and service quality improvements.
Energy consumption represents another critical impact, with utilities spending significant portions of operational budgets on electricity for pumping and treatment processes. Inefficient pumping operations, excessive system pressures, and poor network design contribute to unnecessary energy consumption. Optimization programs combining pressure management, pump efficiency improvements, and operational scheduling modifications can reduce energy costs by 15-25% while simultaneously decreasing leakage rates through lower system pressures.
Broader Economic and Social Impacts:
Household Economic Burden:
• Substantial monthly expenses on water boiling and treatment for safety
• Costs for purchasing bottled water or water from vendors for drinking
• Time costs for water collection from distant sources or vendor purchases
• Health expenses related to waterborne diseases from unsafe water sources
• Reduced household income available for education, nutrition, and economic advancement
• Disproportionate impact on low-income families spending higher percentage of income on water
Business and Economic Development Impacts:
• Industrial productivity limitations from unreliable water supply affecting manufacturing
• Commercial sector costs for alternative water sources and onsite treatment systems
• Reduced foreign direct investment due to inadequate utility infrastructure
• Tourism sector constraints from water quality and availability concerns
• Agricultural impacts from groundwater depletion caused by inadequate piped water access
• Limited economic development in areas lacking reliable water service infrastructure
Service coverage limitations perpetuate Indonesia's water access challenges. Current piped water coverage reaches only about 20% of households, far below the government's 2030 target of universal access. Expanding coverage requires not only new infrastructure investment but also improved financial performance from existing utilities to generate capital for network expansion. NRW reduction directly enables coverage expansion by freeing water production capacity for new connections while improving revenue generation supporting infrastructure investment.
Technology Solutions and Digital Transformation Opportunities
Advanced water management technologies offer proven solutions for Indonesia's PDAM operational challenges, with successful implementations demonstrating achievable NRW reduction targets and operational efficiency improvements.5 Technology deployment must align with utility technical capacity, financial resources, and operational requirements to ensure sustainable implementation generating measurable performance improvements.
District Metered Areas (DMA) implementation provides fundamental infrastructure for systematic water loss identification and control, enabling utilities to isolate network sections for targeted leak detection and repair programs.6 DMA boundaries incorporate flow meters and pressure sensors monitoring water consumption patterns, identifying anomalies indicating leakage, and supporting performance benchmarking across different network zones. This systematic approach transforms NRW management from reactive repairs to proactive infrastructure management.
Smart metering systems with automated meter reading (AMR) capabilities eliminate manual reading errors while providing real-time consumption data supporting customer service improvements and billing accuracy enhancements essential for revenue protection. Advanced metering infrastructure enables utilities to detect customer-side leaks, identify consumption anomalies suggesting meter tampering or theft, and provide customers with detailed usage information promoting water conservation behaviors.
Proven Technology Solutions Portfolio:
Network Monitoring and Control:
• District Metered Areas with boundary flow meters and pressure management systems
• Real-time SCADA systems integrating sensors, controls, and data analytics platforms
• Pressure management equipment reducing leakage through optimized system pressures
• Flow monitoring devices identifying consumption patterns and detecting anomalies
• Leak detection equipment including acoustic sensors and correlation systems
• Network modeling software for hydraulic analysis and infrastructure planning
Customer Metering and Billing:
• Smart meters with remote reading capabilities eliminating manual reading errors
• Automated meter reading (AMR) systems providing real-time consumption data
• Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) enabling two-way communication capabilities
• Customer information systems integrating billing, collections, and service requests
• Mobile applications for customer engagement and payment processing
• Geographic information systems linking customer locations with network infrastructure
Operational Management:
• Work order management systems optimizing field operations and resource allocation
• Maintenance management platforms scheduling preventive maintenance activities
• Asset management systems tracking infrastructure condition and performance
• Performance dashboards providing real-time operational metrics to management
• Predictive analytics platforms identifying infrastructure failure risks and priorities
• Mobile field applications supporting technicians with real-time information access
Digital monitoring platforms integrating Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, pressure management systems, and predictive analytics enable proactive infrastructure management while optimizing energy consumption through intelligent pumping controls. These platforms provide real-time visibility into network performance, automated alerting for operational anomalies, and data-driven insights supporting continuous improvement initiatives. Integration with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and hydraulic modeling software supports network optimization planning and emergency response capabilities.
Case Studies and Success Stories: Proven Implementation Results
Successful NRW reduction programs across Indonesia demonstrate achievable improvement targets through strategic technology implementation and international partnership support. These case studies provide replicable frameworks and lessons learned applicable across diverse utility contexts, demonstrating that sustained performance improvements are possible with proper planning, adequate resources, and committed management leadership.
Malang City PDAM achieved 30% NRW reduction over a 10-year implementation period through comprehensive infrastructure investment, staff capacity building, and systematic operational improvements supported by international development partners. The program encompassed DMA implementation, customer meter replacement, billing system modernization, and staff training programs developing technical capacity for leak detection and network management. This sustained effort demonstrates the long-term commitment required for fundamental operational transformation.
The USAID-SECO Partnership program (2019-2022) demonstrated measurable results across seven strategic PDAM implementations in West Java and Central Java, with USD 4.5 million investments supporting energy efficiency improvements and NRW reduction initiatives through performance-based grant mechanisms and technical assistance. This program model linked financial support to achievement of specific performance targets, creating accountability and ensuring utility commitment to sustained operational improvements.
Indonesia PDAM Success Case Examples:
PDAM Semarang - Dutch VEI Partnership:
• Reduced NRW through systematic leak detection and repair programs
• Implemented automated commercial dashboards for real-time performance monitoring
• Developed active leak detection teams with specialized training and equipment
• Established performance management systems linking metrics to operational decisions
• Demonstrated effectiveness of water operator partnership model for capacity transfer
• Achieved sustained improvements through institutional capacity development
PAM Jaya Jakarta - Large Scale DMA Program:
• Targeting 30% NRW by 2030 through comprehensive District Metered Area implementation
• Investment value of approximately IDR 981.7 billion for network infrastructure
• Covering 138 DMAs and 658 km of pipeline rehabilitation across 14 areas
• Systematic approach addressing both physical and commercial loss components
• Integration of smart metering technology and customer information systems
• Public-private partnership model supporting large-scale infrastructure investment
Korean KOICA Technology Transfer Programs:
• Successfully implemented NELOW intelligent water leak management systems
• Deployment in Surabaya, Bandung, and Cirebon demonstrating advanced technology applications
• Real-time monitoring and analytics for proactive leak detection and response
• Capacity building programs training utility staff in advanced technology operation
• Knowledge transfer supporting long-term operational sustainability
• Demonstration of high-technology solutions adapted to Indonesian utility contexts
WI.Plat signed four strategic MOUs at World Water Forum 2024 with PDAMs in Gunungkidul, Riau Islands (Perumda Tirta Kepri), East Kalimantan (Perumda Tirta Kencana Samarinda), and South Sumatra (Perumda Tirta Musi Palembang) for intelligent water leak management system deployment.3 These partnerships demonstrate growing recognition of advanced technology solutions and increasing willingness of Indonesian utilities to adopt innovative approaches for NRW management.
Investment Opportunities and Strategic Partnership Development
Indonesia's PDAM sector presents substantial investment opportunities for technology providers, performance-based contract specialists, and strategic development partners capable of delivering measurable operational improvements. The sector's critical need for modernization combined with increasing government support for infrastructure development creates favorable conditions for private sector engagement and international partnership development.
The Ministry of Public Works Performance-Based Grant program creates structured investment frameworks supporting utility improvements with clear performance metrics and payment mechanisms linked to operational achievements, prioritizing NRW reduction and energy efficiency improvements. This program model reduces implementation risk by aligning financial incentives with performance outcomes, ensuring that investments generate measurable returns through operational improvements and cost savings.
International partnership opportunities encompass multiple engagement models including technology transfer programs, management consulting services, and comprehensive operational transformation initiatives. Dutch VEI partnerships provide proven frameworks for peer-to-peer technical cooperation while Korean KOICA programs demonstrate advanced technology deployment models including smart sensor networks and predictive analytics platforms. Swiss SECO initiatives focus on performance-based approaches that align private sector capabilities with public utility improvement objectives through structured incentive mechanisms.
Strategic Partnership and Investment Models:
Technology Provider Opportunities:
• Smart metering systems deployment for improved revenue collection and customer service
• Network monitoring equipment including sensors, flow meters, and pressure management
• Software platforms for asset management, work orders, and customer information
• Leak detection technology including acoustic sensors and correlation systems
• SCADA systems integrating real-time monitoring and control capabilities
• Geographic Information Systems and hydraulic modeling software solutions
Performance-Based Contract Models:
• NRW reduction agreements with payments linked to verified water loss improvements
• Energy efficiency contracts sharing savings from consumption optimization
• Revenue enhancement programs improving billing accuracy and collection rates
• Operations management contracts delivering comprehensive service improvements
• Asset management services optimizing infrastructure investment and maintenance
• Training and capacity building programs developing utility technical capabilities
Public-Private Partnership Structures:
• Design-Build-Operate contracts for water treatment and distribution facilities
• Management contracts providing operational expertise and performance improvement
• Joint ventures combining public assets with private technical and financial resources
• Service contracts for specific functions including billing, metering, or maintenance
• Lease arrangements transferring operational responsibility while maintaining public ownership
• Build-Own-Operate-Transfer models for major infrastructure development projects
Market opportunities span comprehensive service delivery including pre-implementation assessments, technology system design and installation, operator training programs, and long-term performance optimization services. The fragmented nature of Indonesia's utility sector creates opportunities for standardized solution development while local customization requirements support specialized consulting services for regulatory compliance, stakeholder engagement, and institutional capacity building.
Implementation Framework and Strategic Roadmap
Successful PDAM transformation requires systematic implementation approaches addressing technical, financial, and institutional improvement requirements through phased development programs. Implementation planning must balance quick wins demonstrating immediate value with longer-term structural improvements requiring sustained commitment and resource allocation. Effective programs sequence activities to build momentum, develop capabilities, and achieve progressively more ambitious performance targets.
Initial assessment phases focus on baseline performance evaluation, infrastructure condition assessment, and institutional capacity analysis enabling customized improvement strategies aligned with local conditions and stakeholder priorities.7 These assessments identify critical performance gaps, prioritize intervention areas, and establish measurement frameworks for tracking improvement progress and demonstrating results to stakeholders.
Technical preparation encompasses network mapping, hydraulic modeling, and DMA boundary design supported by comprehensive staff training programs ensuring sustained operational capability for advanced water management systems. This preparation phase establishes technical foundations for subsequent technology deployment while building internal capacity for system operation and maintenance. Utilities must invest in staff development before or concurrent with technology implementation to ensure sustainable operational performance.
Phased Implementation Approach:
Phase 1 - Assessment and Planning (3-6 months):
• Baseline performance evaluation establishing current NRW levels and loss components
• Infrastructure condition assessment identifying critical repair and replacement priorities
• Institutional capacity analysis evaluating organizational strengths and development needs
• Stakeholder engagement securing management commitment and political support
• Strategic planning defining improvement targets, timelines, and resource requirements
• Financing strategy development identifying funding sources and financial mechanisms
Phase 2 - Foundation Building (6-12 months):
• Network mapping and GIS database development documenting infrastructure assets
• Hydraulic modeling establishing baseline system performance characteristics
• DMA boundary design optimizing zone sizes and metering locations
• Staff training programs building technical capacity for advanced operations
• Pilot project implementation demonstrating technologies and approaches
• Performance management system establishment creating accountability frameworks
Phase 3 - Technology Deployment (12-24 months):
• DMA infrastructure installation including boundary meters and pressure management
• Smart metering system deployment with automated reading capabilities
• Monitoring platform implementation integrating sensors and analytics
• Customer information system upgrade improving billing and collection processes
• Asset management system deployment supporting maintenance planning
• Field operations optimization through mobile applications and work management
Phase 4 - Performance Optimization (24-36 months and ongoing):
• Leak detection and repair programs systematically addressing identified losses
• Pressure management optimization reducing leakage through system improvements
• Customer meter maintenance and replacement programs ensuring billing accuracy
• Illegal connection elimination campaigns improving revenue collection
• Energy efficiency improvements reducing operational costs
• Continuous improvement programs sustaining performance gains and capability development
Performance-based implementation frameworks create accountability mechanisms linking payment structures to measurable operational improvements while providing technical support for capacity building and system optimization. Key Performance Indicators include NRW reduction targets, energy efficiency improvements, customer service enhancements, and financial sustainability metrics measured through independent verification and third-party monitoring systems ensuring objective performance assessment.
Implementation timelines typically span 3-5 years enabling systematic infrastructure development, staff capacity building, and institutional strengthening programs essential for sustainable performance improvements. Quick wins during initial phases demonstrate value and build stakeholder support while longer-term initiatives address fundamental structural challenges requiring sustained commitment and resource investment.
Critical Success Factors and Risk Mitigation
Strategic partnerships require comprehensive stakeholder engagement including local government commitment verification, utility management agreement, and community outreach programs supporting service expansion and quality improvements. Success depends heavily on political support, management stability, and organizational culture receptive to change and performance improvement. Programs must address these institutional factors alongside technical and financial dimensions.
Implementation Success Factors:
Organizational and Leadership Requirements:
• Strong management commitment to performance improvement and operational excellence
• Political support from local government leadership ensuring sustained resource allocation
• Organizational culture embracing performance management and accountability
• Management stability minimizing disruption from leadership changes
• Clear communication of goals, progress, and achievements to stakeholders
• Champion identification at all organizational levels driving change initiatives
Technical and Operational Factors:
• Adequate financial resources for infrastructure investment and technology acquisition
• Comprehensive staff training building capability for advanced system operation
• Realistic performance targets aligned with utility capacity and resources
• Systematic approach addressing all NRW components rather than isolated initiatives
• Quality implementation ensuring technology systems function as designed
• Preventive maintenance programs sustaining infrastructure performance over time
External Support and Partnerships:
• Effective stakeholder engagement securing community support and cooperation
• Technical assistance from experienced partners providing expertise and guidance
• Peer learning opportunities sharing lessons and best practices across utilities
• Robust monitoring and evaluation systems tracking progress and identifying issues
• Independent verification ensuring objective performance assessment
• Adaptive management allowing program adjustments based on implementation experience
Regulatory compliance encompasses BPPSPAM performance standards, Ministry of Public Works operational requirements, and local government approval processes for infrastructure investment and tariff structure modifications. Programs must navigate complex regulatory environments while maintaining focus on operational improvements and service quality enhancements delivering tangible benefits to customers and communities.
Professional Consulting Services and Strategic Implementation Support
Successful NRW reduction and operational improvement programs require specialized expertise in water utility management, technology implementation, and institutional development. Strategic consulting partners provide objective assessment, technology selection guidance, implementation management, and capacity building support ensuring programs achieve intended results while building sustainable internal capabilities for long-term performance excellence.
Professional services encompass comprehensive program lifecycle support from initial feasibility assessment through long-term performance optimization, ensuring utilities maximize return on technology investment while maintaining operational excellence. Consultants bring international best practice knowledge, proven implementation methodologies, and objective perspective enabling utilities to avoid common pitfalls while accelerating improvement timelines through structured approaches and experienced guidance.
References
1. Infrastructure Asia & World Bank Group. 3 Steps to the Sustainable Reduction of Non-Revenue Water in Indonesia - Comprehensive Assessment Report 2022.
https://www.infrastructureasia.org/Insights/3-Steps-to-the-Sustainable-Reduction-of-Non-Revenue-Water-in-Indonesia
2. Muhammad Khaidir Arief. The Effect of Tariffs, Existence of Internal Control Committee, and Number of Customers on the Performance of Regional-Owned Water Supply Company (PDAM) In Indonesia, Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara 2024.
https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/2893
3. WI.Plat. WI.Plat Signs 4 MOUs with Indonesian PDAMs for NRW Management at World Water Forum 2024 - Strategic Partnership Announcement.
https://wiplat.com/blog/wi-plat-signs-4-mous-with-indonesian-pdams-for-nrw-management-at-world-water-forum-2024/
4. Utama, C. Permasalahan Non-Revenue Water (NRW) dalam Pelayanan Air Bersih - Technical Analysis and Solutions Framework.
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/27695-ID-permasalahan-non-revenue-water-nrw-dalam-pelayanan-air-bersih.pdf
5. International Water Association. Digital Water: Smart Solutions for Non-Revenue Water - Technology Applications and Case Studies.
https://iwa-network.org/news/digital-water-smart-solutions-for-non-revenue-water/
6. Purifikasi Journal. Strategi Pengendalian Non-Revenue Water (NRW) - Implementation Methodologies and Best Practices.
https://purifikasi.id/index.php/purifikasi/article/download/450/394/
7. Wiedilaksono, A. Strategi Penurunan Tingkat Kehilangan Air di Perumda Air Minum Kota Semarang, Universitas Diponegoro 2025.
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpii/article/view/25821
8. Luthfianto et al. Analisis Air Tak Berekening (Non Revenue Water) Menggunakan Metode Neraca Air di Perumda Air Minum Tirta Giri Nata Kota Cirebon, JSE Journal 2025.
https://jse.serambimekkah.id/index.php/jse/article/view/1125
9. Repository Universitas Brawijaya. Reducing Non Revenue Water di PDAM Unit Karangploso - Case Study Analysis 2023.
https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/212924/
10. Madinah, NZ. Analisis Pengendalian Kehilangan Air Jaringan Pipa di Depok, Syntax Literate Journal 2024.
https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/17247/10416
11. Kementerian Keuangan Indonesia. Mengoptimalkan Peran KPBU dalam Penurunan NRW: Sebuah Strategi untuk Layanan Air Minum yang Lebih Baik, 2021.
https://kpbu.kemenkeu.go.id/read/1211-1741/umum/kajian-opini-publik/mengoptimalkan-peran-kpbu-dalam-penurunan-nrw-sebuah-strategi-untuk-layanan-air-minum-yang-lebih-baik
12. PAM Jaya Jakarta. Non Revenue Water Project 2024 - Investment Opportunity and Technical Specifications.
https://invest.jakarta.go.id/potential-projects/113/non-revenue-water-project-2024
13. World Bank. Managing Non-Revenue Water: A Toolkit for Water Utilities - Comprehensive Implementation Guide.
https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/887831468325498835/managing-non-revenue-water-a-toolkit-for-water-utilities
14. Asian Development Bank. Reducing Non-Revenue Water in Asia - Regional Best Practices and Case Studies.
https://www.adb.org/publications/reducing-non-revenue-water-asia
15. International Water Association. NRW Management Strategy and Case Studies - Global Implementation Framework.
https://iwa-network.org/publications/non-revenue-water-management-strategy-and-case-studies/
PDAM Non-Revenue Water Reduction and Operational Excellence Programs
SUPRA International provides comprehensive consulting services for Indonesian PDAM utilities seeking to reduce Non-Revenue Water, improve operational efficiency, and achieve financial sustainability. Our team supports water utilities across feasibility assessment, technology selection, implementation management, capacity building, and performance optimization throughout complete program lifecycle.
Need expert guidance on PDAM operational improvement and NRW reduction?
Contact us to discuss your water utility challenges and explore strategic improvement solutions
Share:
If you face challenges in water, waste, or energy, whether it is system reliability, regulatory compliance, efficiency, or cost control, SUPRA is here to support you. When you connect with us, our experts will have a detailed discussion to understand your specific needs and determine which phase of the full-lifecycle delivery model fits your project best.